One of the first things which struck me about the Qur’an the first time I read it was how it can suddenly and jarringly jump to a completely different scene,
I’ve often been told that the Torah and the Injil were only for the Jews. However, two problems: The Pickthall translation doesn’t hide it: He hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad)
John Fontain recently debated David Wood on the Islamic Dilemma, which points out that the Qu’ran both affirms the Torah and Gospel while contradicting them. John has a rather different
Those who attempt to say that the Qur’an teaches the corruption of the earlier scriptures, often appeal to Qur’an 5:48, but this argument turns on the translation of the word
I’m reading through the Qu’ran one last time this year and wanted to follow along with a Tafsir. I discovered Quran Garden which was just the sort of thing I
The Qur’an claims that if it were not from God, there would be many contradictions in it. However, there is one Qur’anic verse which presents an inherent contradiction! In chapter
The sun sets in muddy spring (18:86) Semen comes from between backbone & ribs (86:6-7) Stars are missiles to shoot devils (67:5) If a fly lands in your drink, one
The Qur’an speaks about Allah helping the followers of Jesus and keeping them “uppermost”, but this presents a dilemma since, historically, this has to refer to Trinitarian Christians… which is
Here are some statistics from 2003 conducted by The Jenkins Group:
• One-third of high school graduates never read another book for the rest of their lives.
• 42 percent of college graduates never read another book after college.
• 80 percent of U.S. families did not buy or read a book last year.
• 70 percent of U.S. adults have not been in a bookstore in the last five years.
• 57 percent of new books are not read to completion.
Shocking, right? I mention these statistics because I am currently picking out the books I’m going to read in 2013, drawing heavily from the Best Catholic Books of All-Time list posted by Brandon Vogt:
I’ll be posting my 2013 Reading List in a week or two. So what books do you plan to read next year?
I little while ago I finished reading a great article series on Catholic Exchanged entitled “How not to become Catholic” by James Tonkowich. I highly recommend it:
I’ve now posted quite a few Best of British posts and, although I’m sure I’ll do one or two more at some point in the future, I’ve pretty much covered most of the British comedy shows that I love. For this entry I thought I’d mention two relatively recent shows produced by the comedy duo David Mitchell and Robert Webb.
Peep Show
The dubiously named “Peep Show” was my first exposure to Mitchell & Webb. The show’s central characters are two friends, Mark and Jeremy. Mark is repressed, uptight and slightly obsessive, whereas Jeremy is his antithesis: directionless, hedonistic and more than a little thick.
The humour is often crass and tasteless, but has some really wonderful moments. The camera will often switch to the view of one of the characters and, when this happens, the audience gets the privilege of hearing that person’s inner monologue. Upon trying to talk his way out of a tricky situation you hear Jeremy think “That’s it, just say whatever you need to say….they’re just words…you can think about what they mean later”. We are also treated to a wonderful presentation of “bloke wisdom” when, while talking to a girl, we hear Mark think: “My God, she’s beautiful….I bet nobody’s ever told her…I should tell her!…wait, no…if I tell her and she realizes it, she’ll dump me for sure”…
That Mitchell and Webb Look
Following the success of “Peep Show”, Mitchell and Webb produced a comedy sketch show. I think it’s hard to do sketch shows well and it’s extremely hard to keep the comedy standard consistent between different sketches.
It’s quite rare that I ever want to watch an episode of a sketch show more than once, but I’ve found “That Mitchell and Webb Look” to have good replay value, having some particularly great sketches such as the Nasty Vicar, The Homeopathic Emergency Room and, of course, what’s comedy without some Nazis?
On the occasions I visit a non-Catholic congregation I always seem to end up getting a preacher who tells me to turn to my neighbour and say stuff. Well, it turns out that this presentation technique really annoys Michael Joiner too…
The following is the parable of the King and the Maiden by Soren Kierkegaard:
Suppose there was a king who loved a humble maiden. The king was like no other king. Every statesman trembled before his power. No one dared breathe a word against him, for he had the strength to crush all opponents. And yet this mighty king was melted by love for a humble maiden who lived in a poor village in his kingdom. How could he declare his love for her? In an odd sort of way, his kingliness tied his hands. If he brought her to the palace and crowned her head with jewels and clothed her body in royal robes, she would surely not resist – no one dared resist him. But would she love him?
She would say she loved him, of course, but would she truly? Or would she live with him in fear, nursing a private grief for the life she had left behind? Would she be happy at his side? How could he know for sure? If he rode to her forest cottage in his royal carriage, with an armed escort waving bright banners, that too would overwhelm her. He did not want a cringing subject. He wanted a lover, an equal. He wanted her to forget that he was a king and she a humble maiden and to let shared love cross the gulf between them. For it is only in love that the unequal can be made equal.
The king, convinced he could not elevate the maiden without crushing her freedom, resolved to descend to her. Clothed as a beggar, he approached her cottage with a worn cloak fluttering loose about him. This was not just a disguise – the king took on a totally new identity – He had renounced his throne to declare his love and to win hers.