This all sounds so familiar…
Yesterday I published a blog entry which contained the text which we are going to study tonight at the JP2 Group. We’re going to read this document as part of our three-week series looking at worship in the Early Church.
The text I posted yesterday was a substantial extract from a work by Justin Martyr. St. Justin was a Christian in the 2nd Century and he wrote an apologetic work addressed to the Emperor known as his First Apology. In this ancient document he provides a defense of the Christian faith, but he also describes in some detail the Christian worship of his era.
Justin wrote his First Apology in around AD 150 and, despite the nascent state of the Church at this time, the liturgy has a clear structure. Catholics and all those who attend “liturgical” churches should be able to recognize many things in Justin’s description which are present in their own worship:
1. Sunday Worship
Groups such as the Seventh Day Adventists say that Christians should worship on the Sabbath (Saturday), but it’s clear from St. Justin that in the Second Century Christian worship was on Sunday:
“And on the day called ‘Sunday’, all who live in cities or in the countryside gather… We hold our assembly on Sunday because it is the first day, on which God brought forth the world from darkness and matter. On the same day, Jesus Christ our Saviour rose from the dead”
2. Deacons
It is the role of Deacons to distribute Communion:
“…those who are called ‘deacons’ give to each person present a portion”
3. Reading of Scripture
The Sunday liturgy begins with a Liturgy of the Word:
“…the memoires of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read”
4. Homily
The one leading the liturgy teaches from the Readings which have been heard:
“…the president instructs and exhorts [the congregation] to the imitation of these good things [from Scripture]”
5. Prayers of the Faithful
The Church gathers together to intercede for themselves and the world:
“…we offer hearty prayers: for ourselves, for the [baptized] person, and for all others in every place…we all rise together and pray”
6. The Poor Box
Money is collected for the poor:
“Those who are able, give willingly whatever sum they think appropriate. The money collected is deposited with the president…he takes care of all who are in need”
7. Sign of Peace
Justin’s description makes a handshake seem quite lame, doesn’t it? 😉
“…we greet one another with a kiss”
8. Bread and Wine
The Eucharist is central to Justin’s description of worship.
“Then bread and a cup of wine mixed with water are brought to the president of the brethren”
In the Second Century wine mixed with water is brought to the one presiding. In today’s Roman liturgy it is the priest himself who mixes the water and wine, praying “By the mystery of this water and wine may we come to share in the divinity of Christ”.
9. Eucharistic Prayers
The one presiding over the Eucharist leads the people in prayer, at least a portion of which appears to have been prayed extemporaneously:
“…he gives praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and he offers thanks at considerable length…according to his ability”
It is also noteworthy that, although the word “Trinity” is not used (since the word has not yet been invented), Justin’s theology is clearly Trinitarian!
10. The Amen
Certain Hebrew words are present in the liturgy:
“…all the people present express their assent by saying ‘Amen’, the Hebrew for ‘so be it’”
11. Body and Blood
Justin communicates very clearly that what is being received is not simply bread and wine, but Jesus’ Body and Blood:
“We do not receive these as common bread and drink…we have been taught that the food blessed by the prayer of his word…is the flesh and blood of Jesus who was made flesh.”
12. Extraordinary Eucharistic Ministers Eucharist for those who are absent
The Eucharist is taken to those who cannot attend the liturgy:
“The deacons carry a portion to those who are absent”
It is worth noting that this sits awkwardly with Lutheran Eucharistic theology since many Lutherans believe that, although Christ is made present in the Eucharist (“consubstantial”), He is only present in the bread and wine only during the Eucharistic liturgy itself. This is not a universally held belief among Lutherans though.
I have a couple of other thoughts, but I’ll save those until tomorrow 🙂
Er…. re #12: am I missing something? That seems to be a support for deacons as ministers of Communion outside Mass, not EEMs.
Okay, that’s a poorly-chosen title. In my head when I think “Extraordinary Eucharistic Minister” I just think of someone taking Holy Communion to the sick, regardless of that person’s ordained status.
I’ve changed it. Do I get my Nihil Obstat now? 😉
Hmm … seems to me I’ve been at one of these gatherings before. Some kind of church thingy ….
Well, since there seems to be a little technical stuff in here, I’ll add something technical. The insructions for prayer at the Eucharist are really varied. The Didache likes its prayers and prefers them to extemporaneous ones. Hippolytus’ _Apostoloc Traditions_, though, definitely considers an eloquent bishop’s extemporaneous prayers better than any prescribed ones, but the less eloquent … well, stick to the text. Justin, as you point out, doesn’t have prescribed prayers.
One of the things that has always seemed interesting to me is their willingness to use the word “eloquent” to describe gifted teachers and leaders. To me, that seems kind of “from self” rather than from God, but clearly Irenaeus and others didn’t see it that way.
> The insructions for prayer at the Eucharist are really varied. The Didache…Apostolic Tradition…Justin…
True, but at the same time, it’s worth keeping in mind that these documents come from slightly different time periods and geographical locations. Even though there’s clear structure to the Sunday services, it’s still the Church’s “Wild West” years 😉
> One of the things that has always seemed interesting to me is their willingness to use the word “eloquent” to describe gifted teachers and leaders. To me, that seems kind of “from self” rather than from God, but clearly Irenaeus and others didn’t see it that way.
For what it’s worth, I’ve always view the “eloquence” mentioned as being a charism, a gift from God, rather than the learned rhetoric of the Greeks and Romans.