Meeting people with Android phones…
Why NO Christian Should Have a Smart Phone
I’m a Patreon support of Pints With Aquinas and the other day, Matt Fradd asked for objections to the assertion that “NO Christian should have a Smart Phone”. Here’s how I replied:
My two objections are as follows…
(A) Smart Phones are not intrinsically evil – abusus non tollis usum. Therefore you are encouraging people to forsake the goods of a smart phone unnecessarily.
(B) On a more personal level, I have several people in my life who are all-or-nothing types. No new hobby lasts long before it’s added to the long list of things from which they must abstain because they’t do it moderation. From the outside it seems like they rarely develop much of the crucial virtue of temperance.
David Bates, Patreon Supporter
Also, the angelic living rarely lasts forever and often results in bing-purge cycles.
At the end of a recent episode on this subject, a response was given to these objections:
Honestly, I was rather disappointed. I was expecting a better-prepared response, particularly from folks trained in philosophy, to what I considered to be some fairly obvious objections.
He saw that it was good
Simply adopting an Augustinian conception of evil doesn’t avoid my objections. Yes, everything is ultimately “good” because it was made by God – Marc spent most of his time emphasizing this almost to the point of caricature and straw-manning, as though one must first adopt Gnosticism in order to describe something as “intrinsically evil”. Marc said:
“I’m trying to imagine what this would be like, if Christian morality somehow involved getting rid of the things that are evil in themselves… what would that be? What would I get rid of?”
Marc Barnes
However, it’s not a term foreign to Catholic thought:
“hostile to life itself . . . whatever violates the integrity of the human person . . . whatever is offensive to human dignity,”
Pope St. John Paul “The Great”, Veritatis Splendor quoting Gaudium et Spes
Matt Fradd pointed out that there are even “goods” involved in sin, giving pornography as an example. Okay, but pornography is a distortion of the sex act. Sex has a licit context. Therefore, to answer Marc’s question, we’d get rid of the distortion, not the elements which are being distorted. As I said in my initial comment, just because something can be abused, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t have its legitimate use (abusus non tollis usum).
While conceding that Smart Phones have many goods, Marc seems to be suggesting that there is no such licit context for a Smart Phone. This is what we would expect if we made the moral claim that “NO Christian should have a Smart Phone”. If something cannot possibly be used in any context, isn’t it fair to call it intrinsically evil?
Conceding the debate?
Marc said several times that it “doesn’t follow” to say that smashing your iPhone deprives you of the goods it would otherwise offer, but without any real explanation. If I smash my phone, I don’t get to use Hallow any more! Is he saying that the world would be better without it? Interestingly, Marc then went on to pretty much concedes that people can in fact receive this goods in a licit fashion from their phones! It all seemed rather muddled.
I’m not saying that there isn’t a way of treating the phone for some people , in some situations, that isn’t for them a near occasion of sin. I concede it as possible – I don’t think it’s usual
Marc Barnes
Afterwards, Matt said that people have to decide for themselves whether or not the pro’s of ownership outweigh the con’s, which also seems to deny the assertion that “NO Christian should have a Smart Phone”.
“I can resist anything but temptation” – Wilde
I think Matt’s comment about temperance is legitimate. The Smart Phone isn’t the only place whereby one can develop temperance. I’d also concede that if someone truly knows that they can’t handle a Smart Phone, then the temperate thing to do is indeed to get rid of it.
My point was rather that I’ve noticed a pattern that of my friends who give up their Smart Phones they seem to constantly be giving stuff up. Every new hobby is embraced for a few weeks before they find that they can’t moderate it and so it is added to the ever-increasing list of things which they must eschew entirely. In my experience, these are the sorts of people who say things like “NO Christian should have a Smart Phone”…
Tolkien hated Narnia?
I was invited onto The Tolkien Road podcast with Dr. Holly Ordway to talk about Tolkien’s view of Lewis’ work…
Why is Christmas on December 25th?
Why Go To Church When I Can Pray At Home?
I saw on Twitter a few weeks ago a Protestant minister asking her Twitter followers how they would respond to someone who doesn’t see why they should go to church on Sunday. I don’t think there’s a compelling argument that can really be given for this if one begins with “general” Protestant presuppositions. However, I wanted to put together a post of what some Saints of history have said on the matter…
St. John Chrysostom answers this question briefly when he writes:
They say: ‘We can pray at home.’ You are deceiving yourself, O man! Of course,
one can pray at home. But it is impossible to pray there as in church, where such
a multitude of hearts are uplifted to God, merging into one unanimous cry. You
will not be so quickly heard while praying to the Master by yourself, as when
praying together with your brethren, for here in church there is something
greater than in your room: Agreement, unanimity, the bond of love, and finally
here are the prayers of the priests.
The priests stand before us, then, so that the prayers of the people, being weak,
would be united to their more powerful prayers and together with them ascend to
heaven. The Apostle Peter was freed from prison, thanks to the common prayers
offered for him…. (Act 12:5-17). If the Church’s prayer was so beneficial for the
Apostle Peter and delivered such a pillar of the faith from prison, why, tell me, do
you disdain its power and what kind of justification can you have for this. Listen
to God Himself, Who says that the multitude of people who pray to him with
fervor moves Him to have mercy. He says to the Prophet Jonah: ‘Shall I not spare
Nineveh, that great city, in which dwell more than 120 thousand people.’ He did
not simply mention the multitude of people but that you might know that prayer
together has great power.
St. John Crysostom
St. John of Kronstadt adds:
Here in church is the one thing needful; here is a refuge from vanity and the
storms of life; here is the calm harbor for souls seeking salvation; here is
incorrupt food and drink for souls; here is the light, which enlightens every man
who comes into the world; here is pure spiritual air; here is the well of living water
springing up into everlasting life (John 4:14); here the gifts of the Holy Spirit are
distributed; here is the cleansing of souls. … Here in church, a man will come to
know the true nobility of his soul, the value of life and its aim or his assigned path;
here he dispels the fascination of worldly vanity and worldly passions by
acquiring sobriety in his soul; here he comes to know his destiny, both temporal
and eternal; here he comes to know his bitter, profound fall and seduction by sin;
here the Savior is to be found, particularly in His holy and life, creating Mysteries,
and His salvation; here a man comes to know his true relationship with God and
his neighbor or with his family and the society in which he lives. The church is an
earthly heaven, the place where the closest union with the Divinity occurs; it is a
heavenly school which prepares Christians for heavenly citizenship, teaching
them about the ways of heaven, about the dwellings of heaven; it is the threshold
of heaven; it is the place for common prayer, for thanksgiving, for glorifying the
Triune God, Who created and preserves everything; it is unity with the angels.
What is more precious and more honorable that the church? Nothing. During the
divine service, as on a chart, the whole destiny of the human race is depicted,
from beginning to end. The divine service is the alpha and omega of the destiny of
the world and of men.
St. John of Kronstadt
However, I think St. Ignatius of Antioch is most powerful:
For if I in this brief space of time, have enjoyed such fellowship with your bishop — I mean not of a mere human, but of a spiritual nature — how much more do I reckon you happy who are so joined to him as the Church is to Jesus Christ, and as Jesus Christ is to the Father, that so all things may agree in unity! Let no man deceive himself: if any one be not within the altar, he is deprived of the bread of God. For if the prayer of one or two possesses Matthew 18:19 such power, how much more that of the bishop and the whole Church! He, therefore, that does not assemble with the Church, has even by this manifested his pride, and condemned himself. For it is written, God resists the proud. Let us be careful, then, not to set ourselves in opposition to the bishop, in order that we may be subject to God.
The Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians