{"id":5955,"date":"2011-10-09T07:00:27","date_gmt":"2011-10-09T14:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/?p=5955"},"modified":"2015-02-02T15:34:18","modified_gmt":"2015-02-02T22:34:18","slug":"theres-something-about-mary-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/2011\/10\/09\/theres-something-about-mary-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"There&#8217;s something about Mary&#8230; (Part 2 of 3)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.morganweistling.com\/galleries\/gallery03\/kissingfacegod.html\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-5911\" src=\"http:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/kissingfacegod.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"259\" height=\"347\" srcset=\"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/kissingfacegod.jpg 360w, https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/kissingfacegod-224x300.jpg 224w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 259px) 100vw, 259px\" \/><\/a><a title=\"There\u2019s something about Mary\u2026 (Part 1 of 3)\" href=\"http:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/2011\/10\/08\/theres-something-about-mary-part-1\/\">Yesterday<\/a> I began writing a response to a comment which was left by someone named Kelley on <a title=\"Biblical Mary: The Ark of the New Covenant\" href=\"http:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/2010\/07\/14\/ark-of-the-new-covenant\/\">an article<\/a> I wrote about Blessed\u00a0Mary (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/passage\/?search=luke%201:42&amp;version=NIV\">Luke 1:42<\/a>). This was the comment:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #000080\"><em>&#8220;&#8216;My soul glorifies the Lord and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior.&#8217; If Mary were sinless, why did she need a Savior? Wouldn&#8217;t she be lying? <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #000080\"><em>Did she realize Romans 3:23 All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God? When she compared herself to the law of a holy God, had she realized she had formerly, lied, coveted, dishonored her parents by not always obeying them, etc. and like every single person needs a Savior? There are none good, no not one (Romans 3), except Jesus. 2 Corinthians 5:21 For He (God the Father) made Him (Jesus) who knew no sin to be sin for us that we might become the righteousness of God in Him. Also see Romans 11:6. Thank you Jesus, my Savior.&#8221;<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Today I&#8217;d like to look at some of the Scriptural evidence Kelley uses to develop the case against Mary&#8217;s sinlessness.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<h2>Absolutely All &amp; Absolutely No One<\/h2>\n<p>Kelley wrote:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #000080\"><em>Did [Mary] realize Romans 3:23 [says that] All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God? &#8230;<em>There are none good, no not one (Romans 3)<em>, except Jesus<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>In the passages that Kelley cites, Paul is explaining the relationship between the Jews, the Gentiles, sin and salvation. I think Kelley&#8217;s issue comes from putting an awful lot of emphasis on certain words: <span style=\"color: #993300\">&#8220;<\/span><em><em><span style=\"color: #993300\">there is <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">no one<\/span> who does good,\u00a0<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">not even one<\/span>&#8230;for <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">all<\/span>\u00a0have sinned&#8221;<\/span>. <\/em><\/em>I think it&#8217;s fair to say that Kelley is interpreting the underlined words in an absolute,\u00a0literalistic sense.<\/p>\n<p>In Kelley&#8217;s quotation above, there are two sections of Romans 3 which are used. Let&#8217;s look at those passages each in context and see if this literalistic reading stands up to\u00a0scrutiny&#8230;<\/p>\n<h2>#1: &#8220;There is no one who does good&#8230;not even one&#8230;(well, maybe a few)&#8221;<\/h2>\n<p>The first section that Kelley quotes is found in the following context:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #993300\"><em><em>&#8220;What shall we conclude then? Do we have any advantage? Not at all! For we have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under the power of sin.\u00a0As it is written:\u00a0 &#8216;There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands;\u00a0there is no one who seeks God.\u00a0All have turned away,\u00a0they have together become worthless;\u00a0<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">there is no one who does good,\u00a0not even one<\/span>&#8216; &#8220;<\/em><\/em>\u00a0&#8211; Romans 3:9-12<\/span><\/p>\n<p>In this passage Paul says that\u00a0<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>&#8220;There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands;\u00a0there is no one who seeks God&#8221;<\/em><\/span>. I wonder if Kelley would\u00a0interpret\u00a0this verse with the same absolute,\u00a0literalistic sense that Kelley does in the rest of the passage. Consistently applying this standard of interpretation causes problems when you compare Romans 3 with other parts of Scripture:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span class=\"Apple-style-span\" style=\"color: #993300\">&#8220;<em>In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendant of Aaron.\u00a0<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">Both of them were righteous in the sight of God<\/span>, observing all the Lord\u2019s commands and decrees <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">blamelessly<\/span>.&#8221;<\/em>\u00a0&#8211; Luke 1:5-6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Also, if the statement that <em><span style=\"color: #993300\">&#8220;There is&#8230;no one who seeks God&#8221;<\/span><\/em> is meant in an absolute sense, wouldn&#8217;t that also mean that <em>Kelley<\/em> doesn&#8217;t seek God?<\/p>\n<p>What Paul is quoting here in Romans is a section of the Old Testament (<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>&#8220;As it is written: &#8230;&#8221;<\/em><\/span>). \u00a0Here is the text he quotes in its original context:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>&#8220;The fool\u00a0says in his heart,\u00a0<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>\u00a0 \u00a0&#8216;There is no God&#8217;\u00a0<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>They are corrupt, their deeds are vile;\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>The LORD looks down from heaven<br \/>\non all mankind<br \/>\nto see if there are any who understand,<br \/>\nany who seek God<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>All have turned away, all have become corrupt;<br \/>\n<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">there is no one who does good,\u00a0<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">not even one&#8221;<\/span><\/em>\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Psalm 14:1, 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Oh dear&#8230;things do look pretty bleak. It really does look like there is nobody good on earth at all! However, later in the psalm we read:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>&#8220;They devour <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">my people<\/span> as though eating bread;<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>they never call on the LORD.<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>But there they are, overwhelmed with dread,<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>for <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">God is present in\u00a0the company of the righteous<\/span>.<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>You evildoers frustrate the plans of the poor,<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>but the LORD is their refuge.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>Oh, that salvation for Israel would come out of Zion!<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>When the LORD restores <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">his people<\/span>,<\/em><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>let Jacob rejoice and Israel be glad!&#8221;<\/em>\u00a0&#8211; Psalm 14:4-7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Reading the rest of this psalm makes it clear that hyperbole is being used in the first section. The world is <em>not<\/em>\u00a0completely, absolutely and totally made up of evildoers. The people he is describing are those who\u00a0<em><span style=\"color: #993300\">&#8220;who say &#8216;There is no God'&#8221;<\/span>. <\/em>The psalmist doesn&#8217;t identify himself with that group and he also identifies another group of people whom he calls <em><span style=\"color: #993300\">&#8220;the righteous&#8221;<\/span><\/em>.\u00a0So, when a poet says that\u00a0<span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>&#8220;there is no one who does good,\u00a0not even one&#8221;<\/em><\/span>\u00a0he&#8217;s not meant to be taken literally&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>So, that&#8217;s Passage #1 covered, but what about Passage #2?<\/p>\n<h2>#2: &#8220;All have sinned&#8230;(well, mostly all&#8230;)&#8221;<\/h2>\n<p>The\u00a0next bit of Romans that Kelley quotes is as follows:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>&#8220;&#8230; There is no difference between Jew and Gentile,\u00a0<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God<\/span>,\u00a0and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.&#8221;<\/em>\u00a0&#8211; Romans 3:22-23<\/span><\/p>\n<p>So what about this <em><span style=\"color: #993300\">&#8220;<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">all<\/span> have sinned&#8221;<\/span><\/em>\u00a0stuff? Surely that&#8217;s straight-forward enough? This is absolute proof that Mary couldn&#8217;t be sinless.\u00a0It means that every single human being that has ever lived has committed personal sin, right? Well&#8230;no, not quite&#8230; Actually, despite what is written, Kelley adds an exception to this passage:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><span style=\"color: #000080\"><em>Did [Mary] realize Romans 3:23 [says that] All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God? &#8230;<em>There are none good, no not one (Romans 3)<em>, <\/em><\/em><\/em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">except Jesus<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The part that I&#8217;ve underlined in not in Romans 3! Paul doesn&#8217;t explicitly exempt Jesus from his statement that\u00a0<em><span style=\"color: #993300\">&#8220;<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">all<\/span>\u00a0have sinned&#8221;<\/span>\u00a0<\/em>. Rather, that was something Kelley added, and quite rightly so. However, from this we can conclude that when Paul says that <span style=\"color: #993300\"><em>&#8220;<span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">all<\/span> have sinned&#8221;<\/em><\/span> he didn&#8217;t necessarily mean literally every single person. If there is room for one unwritten exception, then why not more? Is it out of the realms of possibility that there could be others?<\/p>\n<p>What about the unborn? What about babies? What about little children before the age of reason? Have they committed personal sin? The answer has to be &#8220;no&#8221;. So, if this <span style=\"color: #993300\">&#8220;all&#8221;<\/span> doesn&#8217;t apply to the unborn, infants, those before the age of reason, as well as Jesus, the New Adam, is it really out of the realms of possibility that it might also not apply to Mary, the New Eve?<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;ll do for today. I&#8217;ll finish this up tomorrow.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/flower.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-5991\" src=\"http:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/flower.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"226\" height=\"173\" srcset=\"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/flower.png 377w, https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/flower-300x229.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 226px) 100vw, 226px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a title=\"There\u2019s something about Mary\u2026 (Part 1 of 3)\" href=\"http:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/2011\/10\/08\/theres-something-about-mary-part-1\/\">Part 1<\/a> |\u00a0Part 2\u00a0|\u00a0<a title=\"There\u2019s something about Mary\u2026 (Part 3 of 3)\" href=\"http:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/2011\/10\/10\/theres-something-about-mary-part-3\/\">Part 3<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I began writing a response to a comment which was left by someone named Kelley on an article I wrote about Blessed\u00a0Mary (Luke 1:42). This was the comment: &#8220;&#8216;My soul glorifies the Lord and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior.&#8217; If Mary were sinless, why did she need a Savior? Wouldn&#8217;t she be lying? Did she realize Romans<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,17],"tags":[2969,448,453,20,446,2609],"class_list":["post-5955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apologetics","category-faith","tag-featured","tag-immaculate-conception","tag-literalism","tag-mary-the-saints","tag-sin","tag-something-about-mary"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5955","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5955"}],"version-history":[{"count":93,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5955\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54873,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5955\/revisions\/54873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5955"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5955"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5955"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}