{"id":48965,"date":"2014-11-06T07:00:45","date_gmt":"2014-11-06T14:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/?p=48965"},"modified":"2015-06-04T12:31:14","modified_gmt":"2015-06-04T19:31:14","slug":"intercommunion-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/2014\/11\/06\/intercommunion-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-Catholics receiving Communion? Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

In my previous post<\/a>, I recounted a little bit of my own story and how I came to reconsider the Catholic teaching concerning intercommunion. In today’s post I would like to present the two main issues around which this teaching revolves.<\/p>\n

\"Wafer\"<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Issue #1: What are you receiving? Or rather, whom?<\/h2>\n

As I see it, there are two main issues concerning the reception of the Lord’s Supper by non-Catholics. The first is a question concerning\u00a0the Eucharist itself. When an Evangelical wishes to receive Communion at Mass, what does he think he is receiving? Here, again, is St. Justin Martyr:<\/p>\n

…We do not receive these as common bread and drink<\/span>. For Jesus Christ our Saviour, made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation. Likewise, we have been taught that the food blessed by the prayer of his word\u2026is the flesh and blood of Jesus<\/span> who was made flesh.<\/em> – Justin Martyr, First Apology, Chapter 66<\/span><\/p>\n

Catholics believe that the Eucharist is really Jesus’ Body and Blood.<\/a>\u00a0Here is what\u00a0St. Ignatius of Antioch wrote in the First Century concerning a heretical group which was troubling the Church:<\/p>\n

They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not confess the\u00a0Eucharist is the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ<\/span>, which suffered for our sins, and which the Father, in His loving-kindness, raised from the dead.<\/em> – Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans, Chapter 7<\/span><\/p>\n

Many Protestants do not hold this belief, reducing the Eucharist to simply bread and some nice\u00a0symbolism. Even if a Protestant\u00a0disagrees with the Catholic understanding of the Eucharist, hopefully he can understand why<\/strong> the Church\u00a0would want to prevent the possibility of people\u00a0treating as simple bread that which we believe to be the body and blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n

However, the Church’s concern goes even further than this. The Catholic Church denies communion to non-Catholics as an act of love<\/strong>, in an effort\u00a0to protect them:<\/p>\n

“Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an\u00a0unworthy manner\u00a0will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord<\/span>. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup.\u00a0<\/em>For any one who eats and drinks\u00a0without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself<\/span>.\u00a0That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died”<\/em>\u00a0– 1 Corinthians 11:29\u201330<\/span><\/p>\n

The Catholic Church takes St. Paul’s grave\u00a0warning extremely seriously.\u00a0From this short extract we can see that St. Paul took the reception of Holy Communion as a really serious issue. This is why Catholics are not allowed to receive the Eucharist while in mortal sin. Receiving the Body and Blood of the Lord in an incorrect manner has serious, serious consequences.<\/p>\n

If the Catholic Church is right about the Eucharist, then surely receiving the Eucharist just as though it were simple bread and wine would be treating the holiest of thing on the planet without sufficient reverence? \u00a0If the Catholic Church were not\u00a0vigilant in her duties, wouldn’t She\u00a0be guilty of being negligent in encouraging a\u00a0communion which may put souls at risk?<\/p>\n

\"Last<\/p>\n

Issue #2: Honest Body language<\/h2>\n

After explaining the above issue to non-Catholics, I sometimes hear the response “But I believe in the Eucharist! I believe Jesus is really present there!”<\/em><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>We could<\/strong><\/em> quibble over the exact meaning of Real Presence, Transubstantion etc, but I think it’s important to understand that belief in the Real Presence\u00a0is only part<\/strong> of the reason that the Catholic Church has closed communion.<\/p>\n

It boils down to this. Although the different Christian denominations have much in common, their unity is imperfect. Until we are united,\u00a0we cannot have sacramental communion. The Lord\u2019s Supper isn\u2019t just the means<\/strong> of making us one, but it is also a a sign\u00a0<\/strong>that we are<\/strong> one.<\/p>\n

Holy Communion has a “vertical” dimension, in that we commune with God, but it also has a “horizontal” dimension, in that we commune with one another. In receiving the Eucharist, I am saying that I believe what the Church teaches and that I am entirely one with my brothers and sisters who are receiving with me.\u00a0\u00a0The Catholic Church believes that it is disingenuous to share Holy Communion with those who do not believe as we do.<\/p>\n

Some\u00a0analogies<\/h3>\n

I’ve been reading a lot of Theology of the Body\u00a0<\/em>recently and it’s inspired in me some analogies which may help to explain this.\u00a0I don’t think I’ve seen these comparisons made\u00a0elsewhere, so if they’re flawed analogies, I’ll take the blame…<\/p>\n

First we need to establish the idea that we can lie with our bodies. For examples, if I sell\u00a0you a car with an engine that’s about to die and, as you leave,\u00a0I\u00a0shake your hand, then I have lied with my body. I have communicated honesty and good-will which\u00a0I don’t, in fact, possess.<\/p>\n

Now, if I sleep with my girlfriend, I have lied with my body. With my body I have said that I have given myself to her completely, but this cannot be true if it is done outside of marriage. Only once a covenant bond of unity has been established can the marital\u00a0sign of unity be expressed in a fully authentic way.<\/p>\n

Somewhat analogously, if\u00a0I receive communion and I\u00a0don’t\u00a0<\/em>believe what the Catholic Church teaches, then I am lying with my body. My\u00a0body is saying one thing but reality does not correspond. When I receive communion I am saying that I am in full communion with all the people present, as well as with the entire Catholic Church. When I receive communion without being in communion with the Church, my “Amen”<\/em> is rendered hollow rather than hallowed.<\/p>\n

\"Wedding\"<\/p>\n

“But I believe everything the Catholic Church teaches!”<\/h2>\n

On rare occasions, I encounter some Protestants who say that, not only do they believe in the Real Presence, but they also believe everything that the Catholic Church teaches. Since this is the case, why then should they not be able to receive the Eucharist? To me, it kinda begs the question: why not be Catholic?!<\/p>\n

I saw a news item a while back where some non-Catholics received communion at a Catholic Church. When later asked about it, their defense was “We believe everything the Catholic Church teaches”<\/em><\/span>. Is that really<\/strong> true though? Do they really believe everything<\/strong>? Even the teachings concerning who may receive the Eucharist?<\/p>\n

If someone visits me at home, I might ask him\u00a0to take off his shoes. I might also ask him\u00a0to refrain from smoking. These do not seem like unreasonable requests. After all, “My house, my rules”<\/em>. Likewise, if a non-Catholic attends Mass, certain things are requested, including that Church teaching is followed concerning the reception of Holy Communion. One would hope that non-Catholic visitors would abide by comply with the “house rules” of their host.<\/p>\n

\"house-rules\"<\/p>\n

The way forward<\/h2>\n

Personally, I\u00a0really, really<\/em> want us to all be in communion with one another once more. I believe that this will only come about through two things. Firstly, through God’s Spirit giving us the humility and wisdom to speak to one another as brother and sister,\u00a0to repent and ask forgiveness of each other and of God. Secondly, unity will only come about through open communication and dialogue concerning our\u00a0differences. We can’t just sweep our theological differences\u00a0under the carpet\u00a0and pretend that we are fully united when we are not.<\/p>\n

Earlier in this post I used the analogy of marriage\u00a0and I would like to return to that for a moment. Marriage is an exclusive covenant in which I\u00a0pledge myself\u00a0to another person exclusively. The marital\u00a0embrace is the sign of this covenant and beautifully expresses its meaning: \u00a0“I am yours completely. I give myself to you: freely, totally, faithfully and fruitfully”<\/em><\/span>. However, what happens when disunity enters a\u00a0marriage? There is selfishness, coercion, infidelity… The conjugal act, rather than being the summit of covenantal expression and renewal, becomes a bodily lie. How is it restored? It’s not fixed by pretending that it’s not a problem. The disunity is resolved through humility, repentance and honest dialogue. Once this is achieve, the expression of oneness and unity is restored.<\/p>\n

The Catholic Church does not restrict communion to be mean and nasty, but for love of all concerned.\u00a0The Eucharist\u00a0is a serious matter for Catholics. Not only that, shared Eucharist\u00a0is an expression of unity and this should always correspond to reality.<\/p>\n

I know this is a \u201chard saying\u201d and, honestly, during my Protestant years and in the early months of my return, I really struggled with it. However, I eventually came to see that the Catholic Church was doing the right thing in delaying Holy Communion until an authentic communion can be restored.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

At the beginning of this post I quoted from the US Bishops and as this post draws to a close, I would like to quote from that same document:<\/p>\n

“We welcome our fellow Christians to this celebration of the Eucharist as our brothers and sisters. We pray that our common baptism and the action of the Holy Spirit in this Eucharist will draw us closer\u00a0to one another and begin to dispel the sad divisions which separate us. We pray that these will lessen and finally disappear, in keeping with Christ\u2019s prayer for us<\/span> \u2018that they may all be one\u2019<\/span> (John 17:21).<\/span><\/em><\/span>
\n – United States Conference of Catholic\u00a0Bishops, “Guidelines For communion”<\/span><\/p>\n

Until that day of unity, we must pray. I am sad when non-Catholics attend the Liturgy with me and they cannot receive, but I encourage them\u00a0to make a spiritual communion and pray for unity:<\/p>\n

My Jesus,<\/em><\/span>
\n I believe that You are present in the Most Holy Sacrament.<\/em><\/span>
\n I love You above all things, and I desire to receive You into my soul.<\/em><\/span>
\n Since I cannot at this moment receive You sacramentally, come at least spiritually into my heart.<\/em><\/span>
\n I embrace You as if You were already there and unite myself wholly to You.<\/em><\/span>
\n Never permit me to be separated from You.<\/em><\/span>
\n Amen.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

In the same way it pains me when non-Catholics remain in the pews at Communion\u00a0at Mass, my heart also sinks when I attend a Protestant service and can’t receive. I don’t like it, but I understand why, and a long time ago I chose to be obedient to the Church. \u00a0I draw comfort and inspiration from St. Monica who, seeing her son so far from the Church, cried out to God all the louder. Likewise, during non-Catholic communion services, I redouble my efforts in praying that Jesus\u2019 words be fulfilled, that \u201cthey all may be one\u201d<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n

\"BenedictBartholomew\"<\/p>\n

Part 1<\/a>\u00a0| Part 2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In my previous post, I recounted a little bit of my own story and how I came to reconsider the Catholic teaching concerning intercommunion. In today’s post I would like to present the two main issues around which this teaching revolves.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_crdt_document":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,17],"tags":[2907,923,2969,2911,1648,954,1061],"class_list":["post-48965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apologetics","category-faith","tag-closed-communion","tag-covenant","tag-featured","tag-intercommunionseries","tag-real-presence","tag-transubstantiation","tag-unity"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48965"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48965\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57870,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48965\/revisions\/57870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/restlesspilgrim.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}