Why NO Christian Should Have a Smart Phone

I’m a Patreon support of Pints With Aquinas and the other day, Matt Fradd asked for objections to the assertion that “NO Christian should have a Smart Phone”. Here’s how I replied:

My two objections are as follows…

(A) Smart Phones are not intrinsically evil – abusus non tollis usum. Therefore you are encouraging people to forsake the goods of a smart phone unnecessarily.

(B) On a more personal level, I have several people in my life who are all-or-nothing types. No new hobby lasts long before it’s added to the long list of things from which they must abstain because they’t do it moderation. From the outside it seems like they rarely develop much of the crucial virtue of temperance.

Also, the angelic living rarely lasts forever and often results in bing-purge cycles.

David Bates, Patreon Supporter

At the end of a recent episode on this subject, a response was given to these objections:

Honestly, I was rather disappointed. I was expecting a better-prepared response, particularly from folks trained in philosophy, to what I considered to be some fairly obvious objections.

He saw that it was good

Simply adopting an Augustinian conception of evil doesn’t avoid my objections. Yes, everything is ultimately “good” because it was made by God – Marc spent most of his time emphasizing this almost to the point of caricature and straw-manning, as though one must first adopt Gnosticism in order to describe something as “intrinsically evil”. Marc said:

“I’m trying to imagine what this would be like, if Christian morality somehow involved getting rid of the things that are evil in themselves… what would that be? What would I get rid of?”

Marc Barnes

However, it’s not a term foreign to Catholic thought:

“hostile to life itself . . . whatever violates the integrity of the human person . . . whatever is offensive to human dignity,”

Pope St. John Paul “The Great”, Veritatis Splendor quoting Gaudium et Spes

Matt Fradd pointed out that there are even “goods” involved in sin, giving pornography as an example. Okay, but pornography is a distortion of the sex act. Sex has a licit context. Therefore, to answer Marc’s question, we’d get rid of the distortion, not the elements which are being distorted. As I said in my initial comment, just because something can be abused, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t have its legitimate use (abusus non tollis usum).

While conceding that Smart Phones have many goods, Marc seems to be suggesting that there is no such licit context for a Smart Phone. This is what we would expect if we made the moral claim that “NO Christian should have a Smart Phone”. If something cannot possibly be used in any context, isn’t it fair to call it intrinsically evil?

Conceding the debate?

Marc said several times that it “doesn’t follow” to say that smashing your iPhone deprives you of the goods it would otherwise offer, but without any real explanation. If I smash my phone, I don’t get to use Hallow any more! Is he saying that the world would be better without it? Interestingly, Marc then went on to pretty much concedes that people can in fact receive this goods in a licit fashion from their phones! It all seemed rather muddled.

I’m not saying that there isn’t a way of treating the phone for some people , in some situations, that isn’t for them a near occasion of sin. I concede it as possible – I don’t think it’s usual

Marc Barnes

Afterwards, Matt said that people have to decide for themselves whether or not the pro’s of ownership outweigh the con’s, which also seems to deny the assertion that “NO Christian should have a Smart Phone”.

“I can resist anything but temptation” – Wilde

I think Matt’s comment about temperance is legitimate. The Smart Phone isn’t the only place whereby one can develop temperance. I’d also concede that if someone truly knows that they can’t handle a Smart Phone, then the temperate thing to do is indeed to get rid of it.

My point was rather that I’ve noticed a pattern that of my friends who give up their Smart Phones they seem to constantly be giving stuff up. Every new hobby is embraced for a few weeks before they find that they can’t moderate it and so it is added to the ever-increasing list of things which they must eschew entirely. In my experience, these are the sorts of people who say things like “NO Christian should have a Smart Phone”

Why Go To Church When I Can Pray At Home?

photo of brown house near mountain
Photo by Janez Podnar on Pexels.com

I saw on Twitter a few weeks ago a Protestant minister asking her Twitter followers how they would respond to someone who doesn’t see why they should go to church on Sunday. I don’t think there’s a compelling argument that can really be given for this if one begins with “general” Protestant presuppositions. However, I wanted to put together a post of what some Saints of history have said on the matter…

St. John Chrysostom answers this question briefly when he writes:

They say: ‘We can pray at home.’ You are deceiving yourself, O man! Of course,

one can pray at home. But it is impossible to pray there as in church, where such

a multitude of hearts are uplifted to God, merging into one unanimous cry. You

will not be so quickly heard while praying to the Master by yourself, as when

praying together with your brethren, for here in church there is something

greater than in your room: Agreement, unanimity, the bond of love, and finally

here are the prayers of the priests.

The priests stand before us, then, so that the prayers of the people, being weak,

would be united to their more powerful prayers and together with them ascend to

heaven. The Apostle Peter was freed from prison, thanks to the common prayers

offered for him…. (Act 12:5-17). If the Church’s prayer was so beneficial for the

Apostle Peter and delivered such a pillar of the faith from prison, why, tell me, do

you disdain its power and what kind of justification can you have for this. Listen

to God Himself, Who says that the multitude of people who pray to him with

fervor moves Him to have mercy. He says to the Prophet Jonah: ‘Shall I not spare

Nineveh, that great city, in which dwell more than 120 thousand people.’ He did

not simply mention the multitude of people but that you might know that prayer

together has great power.

St. John Crysostom

St. John of Kronstadt adds:

Here in church is the one thing needful; here is a refuge from vanity and the

storms of life; here is the calm harbor for souls seeking salvation; here is

incorrupt food and drink for souls; here is the light, which enlightens every man

who comes into the world; here is pure spiritual air; here is the well of living water

springing up into everlasting life (John 4:14); here the gifts of the Holy Spirit are

distributed; here is the cleansing of souls. … Here in church, a man will come to

know the true nobility of his soul, the value of life and its aim or his assigned path;

here he dispels the fascination of worldly vanity and worldly passions by

acquiring sobriety in his soul; here he comes to know his destiny, both temporal

and eternal; here he comes to know his bitter, profound fall and seduction by sin;

here the Savior is to be found, particularly in His holy and life, creating Mysteries,

and His salvation; here a man comes to know his true relationship with God and

his neighbor or with his family and the society in which he lives. The church is an

earthly heaven, the place where the closest union with the Divinity occurs; it is a

heavenly school which prepares Christians for heavenly citizenship, teaching

them about the ways of heaven, about the dwellings of heaven; it is the threshold

of heaven; it is the place for common prayer, for thanksgiving, for glorifying the

Triune God, Who created and preserves everything; it is unity with the angels.

What is more precious and more honorable that the church? Nothing. During the

divine service, as on a chart, the whole destiny of the human race is depicted,

from beginning to end. The divine service is the alpha and omega of the destiny of

the world and of men.

St. John of Kronstadt

However, I think St. Ignatius of Antioch is most powerful:

For if I in this brief space of time, have enjoyed such fellowship with your bishop — I mean not of a mere human, but of a spiritual nature — how much more do I reckon you happy who are so joined to him as the Church is to Jesus Christ, and as Jesus Christ is to the Father, that so all things may agree in unity! Let no man deceive himself: if any one be not within the altar, he is deprived of the bread of God. For if the prayer of one or two possesses Matthew 18:19 such power, how much more that of the bishop and the whole Church! He, therefore, that does not assemble with the Church, has even by this manifested his pride, and condemned himself. For it is written, God resists the proud. Let us be careful, then, not to set ourselves in opposition to the bishop, in order that we may be subject to God.

The Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians

Soul Sleep

I recently had a conversation on YouTube about “Soul Sleep”…

Opening Questions

I began by asking a few questions:

Q1. When a man dies, does he go straight to *judgement* , or straight to *sleep* ?

Just as people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,

Hebrews 9:27

Q2. When we are away from the body and with the Lord, are we *asleep* with the Lord?

Therefore we are always confident and know that as long as we are at home in the body we are away from the Lord. For we live by faith, not by sight. We are confident, I say, and would prefer to be away from the body and at home with the Lord.

2 Corinthians 5:6–8

Q3. At the Transfiguration, were Moses and Elijah briefly woken up and brought up to speed with Jesus’ mission and then sent back to sleep?

Two men, Moses and Elijah, appeared in glorious splendor, talking with Jesus. They spoke about his departure, which he was about to bring to fulfillment at Jerusalem.

Luke 9:30-31

Q4. In Hebrews we’re told that we’re surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses, alluding to a stadium in which former winners are cheering on those currently running the race. However, is this great crowd all *asleep* ?

Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles. And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us,

Hebrews 12:1

Q5. Will the “good thief” be unconscious with Christ until the Second Coming?

And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.”

Luke 23:43

Q6. If all who die are sleeping, how is necromancy even possible, requiring God to ban it?

There shall not be found among you …any one who practices divination, a soothsayer, or an augur, or a sorcerer, or a charmer, or a medium, or a wizard, or a necromancer.

Deuteronomy 18:10-11

The Problematic Parable

However, the real problem for Soul Sleep is the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus. Jesus speaks about two men dying. Do they go to sleep? No – they go to Hades, where one receives blessing and the other receives torment.

If Soul Sleep were true, Jesus should describe them both going to sleep until the Final Judgement and then each being conscious of their eternal fate. However, Jesus doesn’t do this. Not only are they both fully conscious, the Rich Man is concerned for those back on earth.

This can’t just be dismissed because it’s a parable – in every other parable of Jesus he describes a real reality, such as a son leaving his father, a coin being lost, seed falling on different kinds of soil – this one is no different.

1 2 3 4 57